Compare Analytics

Friction / Rage Click / Error Detection

Compare all software platforms supporting this capability.

6 tools supported

Updated:

FullStory

Supported

FullStory is a comprehensive digital analytics platform offering robust session replay and detailed user insights to optimize user experience.

This capability automatically calculates a "Frustration Score" by identifying rage clicks, dead clicks, and error clicks within the user journey.

The platform features a highly advanced, automated friction detection engine that continuously scans the autocaptured data for signs of negative user experience. It specifically looks for technical and UX failures such as "Rage Clicks" (repeated clicking in frustration), "Dead Clicks" (clicking elements that don't respond), "Error Clicks" (clicks occurring immediately before a JavaScript error), and "Thrashed Cursors" (erratic mouse movement). The system aggregates these signals into an overall "Frustration Score" for specific pages or user segments. Analysts can immediately filter the dashboard to view only the session recordings containing these specific friction events, drastically reducing the time required to diagnose critical UI/UX flaws.

Mouseflow

Supported

Mouseflow is a dynamic analytics tool that captures user interactions to enhance website performance with powerful features like session recordings and heatmaps.

The feature automatically flags negative UX indicators, calculating a dynamic "Friction Score" for every recorded session.

The platform features a highly automated friction detection system designed to save time during qualitative analysis. It continuously scans recorded sessions for specific user struggles, automatically tagging videos that contain "click-rage," "bounce," "speed-browsing," or excessive scrolling. It then aggregates these signals to calculate a unified "Friction Score" for each individual session. Analysts can instantly sort their recording library to view only the highest-friction sessions, bypassing thousands of normal visits. This allows UX teams to immediately focus their efforts on diagnosing and fixing the specific UI elements that are actively frustrating users.

Microsoft Clarity is a robust, free analytics tool that delivers deep insights into user behavior with features like heatmaps, session recordings, and funnel analysis.

The feature utilizes machine learning to automatically flag sessions containing "Rage Clicks," "Dead Clicks," and "Quick Backs," instantly highlighting UX issues.

A standout feature of this tool is its automated Friction Detection engine. Instead of forcing analysts to watch hundreds of hours of video to find usability issues, the platform uses machine learning to automatically identify and categorize signs of user frustration. It tags sessions containing "Rage Clicks" (rapidly clicking the same spot), "Dead Clicks" (clicking on an element that has no effect), "Quick Backs" (navigating to a page and immediately returning), and "Excessive Scrolling." These friction metrics are prominently displayed on the main dashboard, allowing UX teams to instantly filter recordings down to only those sessions where users explicitly struggled with the interface.

Lucky Orange

Supported

Lucky Orange is a comprehensive analytics tool designed to optimize website usability and enhance user engagement through features like heatmaps, session recordings, and form analytics.

The platform functionality lacks automated, AI-driven friction scoring (like "rage clicks"), relying instead on manual filtering of session recordings.

Unlike some of its direct competitors in the behavioral analytics space, this platform does not currently feature a highly automated, machine-learning-driven friction detection engine. It does not automatically calculate a "Frustration Score" for sessions or explicitly flag specific "rage click" or "dead click" events on the playback timeline. To find usability issues, analysts must rely on manually filtering the session recording list (e.g., filtering for users who abandoned a form or viewed an error page) and then actively watching the videos to spot the friction points themselves. This requires significantly more manual effort from the UX team during analysis.

Hotjar

Supported

Hotjar provides a powerful suite of tools to enhance user experience through insightful analytics, starting with a free tier for beginners.

The platform functionality automatically highlights periods of user frustration within session recordings, such as u-turns and rage clicks.

To accelerate qualitative research, the platform automatically flags specific behavioral patterns associated with user friction. During session playbacks, the timeline indicates events like "rage clicks" (repeatedly clicking an unresponsive element) and "u-turns" (navigating to a page and immediately returning). Analysts can explicitly filter their entire recording library to only show sessions containing these friction events. While highly useful for quickly spotting broken links or confusing UI elements, the friction detection is strictly tied to the recording module; it does not offer the complex, site-wide automated friction scoring or predictive drop-off modeling found in advanced enterprise digital experience platforms.

Crazy Egg

Supported

Crazy Egg delivers intuitive website analytics with a focus on visualizing user interaction through heatmaps and session recordings, while ensuring data protection compliance.

This capability does not feature advanced, AI-driven friction scoring, requiring analysts to manually identify UX issues through heatmaps and recordings.

Unlike some newer behavioral analytics platforms, this tool does not currently feature an automated, machine-learning-driven friction detection engine. It does not automatically calculate a unified "Frustration Score" or flag explicit UX errors like "dead clicks" or "rage clicks" on a dedicated timeline. To identify areas of friction, analysts must manually review the heatmaps (e.g., looking for concentrated clicks on non-clickable elements) or manually watch session recordings to spot where users hesitate or abandon a flow. This requires a significantly higher degree of manual analysis from the UX team compared to tools that automatically highlight struggling users.